Michael Catanzaro commented: > From my perspective, it's fine to archive the copy of gspell in GNOME's > GitLab. FWIW I do not agree. We have several active projects depending on gspell: ``` elements/core/evince.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/core/gedit.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/core/gnome-builder.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/core/gnome-software.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/world/evolution.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/world/geary.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/world/gitg.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst elements/world/gnome-recipes.bst:- core-deps/gspell.bst ``` This is not going to be so easy to roll back like it was for tepl and amtk. These dependencies need to be dropped *before* the repo is archived. P.S. I'm still waiting for an explanation as to what happened to your other projects in https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/564#note_1086095. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/700#note_1277762 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
_______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
