Philip Chimento commented: I'm the author of an [application](https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.inform7.IDE) that I spent time a few months ago to port from gtkspell to gspell, because gspell was claimed to be a more modern replacement for gtkspell. (The app-author hat is the hat that I'm wearing as I write this, not my GNOME contributor hat.) This request is quite upsetting to me, because I want my application to have GNOME-endorsed dependencies where I can be reasonably sure that if one maintainer loses interest, another will eventually come along and pick it up, or at least be able to make interim releases when asked. I try to avoid as much as possible dependencies that are maintained by just one person. I would feel quite burned if gspell were to move from the former category to the latter. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/700#note_1278091 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.gnome.org.
_______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
