On 3/31/06, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/31/06, Juan José Sánchez Penas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all :) > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 05:45:59PM +0200, Julien Gilli wrote: > > > On 3/28/06, Alejandro Garcia Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I agree, we can investigate the most simple way to build gnome with > > > > mozilla > > > > tinderbox, we can also create some kind of roadmap from that first > > > > deployment in order to analyse what could we get from it. We could even > > > > deploy some kind of sandbox with a simple prototype example, just a > > > > couple > > > > of modules. After buildbot and mozilla-tinderbox tests we can decide. > > > > Does > > > > this suit with what you were planning Jaap, Jérôme, Julien? > > > > > > That sounds good to me. > > > > I work with Alejandro at Igalia, and am also interested on the topic :) We > > have already some very preliminary results we are going to share very soon, > > but I wanted to propose something first. > > > > Maybe we are a bit too close to the deadline for submitting proposals (it > > ends in a few hours), but it looks like it would be a good idea to have > > some kind of organized discussion during Guadec on this topic. What about a > > bof on continuous integration for Gnome? Would it be interesting? > > That would be great.
I realize I should have put lots of exclamation points here. :) So more like: 'That would be great!!!!' Did the talk get submitted? Luis _______________________________________________ gnome-love mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
