Hi! On 3/28/06, Alejandro Garcia Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, we can investigate the most simple way to build gnome with > mozilla > tinderbox, we can also create some kind of roadmap from that first > deployment in order to analyse what could we get from it. We could even > deploy some kind of sandbox with a simple prototype example, just a couple > of modules. After buildbot and mozilla-tinderbox tests we can decide. Does > this suit with what you were planning Jaap, J?r?me, Julien?
I am one of the build guys over at Mozilla; I would be really curious to know your initial impressions and how you use tinderbox. We are looking at improving our own build infrastructure, so I have been watching this conversation with some interest, and trying to get a feel for what else is out there (buildbot seems quite popular). What version of tinderbox are you looking at? Also are you considering doing releases from it, or just using it as a sanity check (e.g. "continous integration" vs. "autobuilder")? Thanks, Rob _______________________________________________ gnome-love mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love
