Hi, happy new year to all lovers (gnomers or else)!

I read the document <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/> initially posted
by Murray, and here is my feedback.

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/who-should-read.html.en
>
- "It will provide an overview how you can use" -> "It will provide an
overview OF how you can use"

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/platform-core.html.en
>
- One has to click the "Section 3.2 -- Virtual File
System<http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/gio.html.en>"
link to know that GVFS is deprecated.

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/graphics.html.en>
- there is no mention of Clutter <http://clutter-project.org/>

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/platform-ipc.html.en
>
- it doesn't mention that today D-BUS is considered a better choice than the
Bonobo/CORBA duo
- I should be mentioned that Bonobo/CORBA still have a niche not covered by
D-BUS, and explained what that is
- it should be mentioned that Bonobo/CORBA are powerful but difficult
technology to master

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/session.html.en>
- is libgnomeui deprecated?
- the link to GnomeClient points to an API reference style page: nothing
wrong with that, but a tutorial on the same subject would be welcome

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/keyring.html.en>
- there are no deeper links explaining the technology to developers (API
reference, tutorials etc)

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/control-center.html.en
>
- again, there are no deeper links explaining the technology to developers
(API reference, tutorials etc)

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/window-manager.html.en
>
- same as above: no links to tutorials

>From <
http://library.gnome.org/devel/platform-overview/stable/other-bindings.html.en
>
- link <the GTK+ bindings page <http://gtk.org/bindings.html>> is broken

Random comments:
- no Anjuta links
- no links to books
- is there a tutorial about drag'n'drop that is getting linked from
somewhere?
- why not have a page whose sole purpose is to link to deprecated
technologies? instead than having the info scattered all over the place?

Regards, chris

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Shaun McCance <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 11:11 -0800, Christian Sasso wrote:
> > Hi Murray,
> >
> > this looks like a good introductory page. I skimmed through it quickly
> > and I noticed that at least sometimes even deprecated stuff is
> > explicitly mentioned:
> >
> > [...] In previous versions of GNOME, the GnomeVFS library was used for
> > access to files and folders. While GnomeVFS provided many of the same
> > features, including transparent access to remote folders, it had a
> > number of limitations which have been addressed in GIO. GnomeVFS is
> > deprecated and should not be used in newly written code, although it
> > will continue to be supported throughout the GNOME 2 lifetime. For
> > information on GnomeVFS, see GnomeVFS - Filesystem Abstraction
> > Library. [...]
> >
> > and about Printing:
> >
> > [...] Work is currently underway to integrate printing directly into
> > GTK+, providing a cross-platform print API that all applications can
> > use. While the current GNOME print framework will be deprecated once
> > GTK+ supports printing, API and ABI stability guarantees ensures that
> > it will continue to be functional and supported throughout the GNOME 2
> > lifecycle. [...]
> >
> > But in general I agree that the page doesn't seem relentless in
> > pointing out what NOT to use. For instance, the page links to
> > documentation about Corba and Bonobo, that if I understand correctly,
> > nobody should use anymore (I may be wrong: it has been a long time).
>
> The Overview has, unfortunately, not been updated much
> since I initially wrote it.  It's definitely due for an
> overhaul, especially for Gnome 3.  I've been doing some
> planning, but it hasn't hit the top of my todo list yet.
>
> Christian, I'd be very interested in any other thoughts
> you have after reading the Overview.  Reader feedback is
> very helpful.
>
> --
> Shaun
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-love mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-love

Reply via email to