On 3/13/06, Aaron Bockover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > f) Must be portable, should be written in C; by portable I mean... > Windows, OS X, other Unixes.
While I'm not against it being deliberatly portable to Windows or OSX, can I ask why you think this is such an essential element? Is it really likely that we'll get the big 3 (itunes, windows media player,winamp) to use it and I don't actually know anyone who uses a different player on these systems (this is not a call for a flood of emails saying "my best friend's cousin's gran's dog's neighbour uses XYZPlayer" or similar anecdotal claims) I just think that for thing that has limited scope to open source media players that run on unix, spending our time making it portable sounds like time that could be better spent on other things...if someone on Windows wants to port it (and contribute patches back) let them, but we've got finite resources here, so lets use them in the best possible way. iain _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
