<quote who="Ross Burton"> > On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 20:40 +1100, James Livingston wrote: > > So while concurrent access isn't a must-have feature, I think it would > > be *very* desirable. In a discussion I had a few weeks ago with Jeff > > Waugh, he mentioned a database called "ldb" or "lmdm" or something (I > > can't remember exactly), which was similar to sqlite but had full > > support for concurrent use. > > ldb (http://ldb.samba.org/), it's a layer on top of tdb that has an > LDAP-like API. Samba uses it as a lightweight LDAP backend. > > Jeff Waugh is Tridge's number one fanboy. ;)
Guys - thanks for raising it so I didn't have to (this time). ;-) tdb, which sits under ldb, supports multi-read/multi-write. It would be more correct to use tdb than ldb (which is an ldapish wrapper around tdb, to put it simply). - Jeff -- FISL 7.0: Porto Alegre, Brazil http://fisl.softwarelivre.org/7.0/www/ "(Hint: IRC clients don't usually do DVD and VCD playback)." - Bastien Nocera _______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
