Hmm you're right, it was about the web browser plugin, while i was thinking about a separate video component.
Does anyone else mean a separate video component, or really a separate web browser plugin? (I don't want to turn the discussion point, just I'm not sure if not someone else maybe meant the same thing as me.) 2008/9/9 Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 15:20 +0200, Milosz Derezynski wrote: > > I just wanted to add once again that i see a huge benefit in having a > > generic browser plugin. > > > > Having Gtk+ code inside GST or even the plugin being part of GST is > > certainly not the right way, > > but having a reusable video component based on Gtk+ and GST Is IMO the > > right way. > > > > For one of my apps, i copied big parts of the Totem video code in > > order to have a well working > > video widget. > > > > Certainly also it is somehow possible to have a generic video > > component which Totem can also > > reuse, even if with much work. > > > > If it could be agreed upon having this, i would be willing to stop > > current projects of mine and work > > towards separating the video component code. > > > > Thoughts? > > What does a web browser plugin have to do with re-using the video > widget? > > > -- Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months. [Bitte beachten Sie, dass dem Gesetz zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung zufolge jeder elektronische Kontakt mit mir sechs Monate lang gespeichert wird.]
_______________________________________________ gnome-multimedia mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-multimedia
