On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 14:20 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El sáb, 23-01-2010 a las 11:31 +0100, Jakub Stroleny escribió: > > > Hi, > > > > there is very useful page that was written by Paul Cutler. > > Please see also the page http://live.gnome.org/GNOME3Myths. > > > > The visible difference between Gnome3 and Gnome2.xx is > > gnome-shell, but there will be possibility to switch > > to classic gnome-panel. Then you needn't stay on Gnome2.xx, > > because Gnome3 can look exactly same as previous line. > > > > I'm not familiar with ubuntu packaging process, but I > > suppose that there won't be Gnome2 available in future, > > because it has been redundant. > > > > __ > > J. > > I am really happy to see that I will still be able to use metacity > since, even liking a lot gnome-shell+mutter (I will probably switch to > it on machines I am able to), I own some old machines with old graphics > card that doesn't have 3D support (and, another one that have a "crashy" > 3D support (an intel one)) > > Thanks for the link :-) > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
even though i use core2duo gnome-shell seems not performing well with my ATI card(at least for the time being). so the best thing for me is to stay with 2.6 bcz i don't want to go to kde too. _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
