Dnia 2010-04-15, czw o godzinie 11:35 -0400, Mark Curtis pisze: > "but are they really necessary on a Day to Day Base? Me thinks not ;)" > I don't use accessibility features on a day to day base, guess that > means no one else does and therefore GNOME Shell shouldn't use it.
If you need accessibility features - you turn it on. If you need dock - you install it. > I don't like this title "Do/not implement Dock" I mean, I personally > would like SOME SORT of window switcher, even if it weren't > specifically a dock. This is exactly what I'm advocating for. We should come up with a nice design for a fast applications switcher, not mindlessly copy-paste dock/taskbar because everyone else uses it. > I loved the idea of breadcrumbs, but the GNOME devs would rather just > waste the space right of the Activities menu to show you the active > application and maybe some mysterious 'menu' if they ever get around > to it. That's just unfair. You shouldn't bash developers, because they did not implement a planned feature yet. Please be constructive and encouraging. GTK+ already has infrastructure for removing the application from its menu. See: http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/ I think it should be integrated in GnomeShell. The way I see it: http://codex.xiaoka.com/~smoku/tmp/app_menu_mockup.png (a bit crude but I'm no artist) _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
