Robert, I'll be honest, I think it's ugly that the workspaces are inequal in size > (each workspace represents a virtual copy of the physical monitor
That is what we have inherited from Gnome2, but it doesn't need to be the case anymore. A workspace may be simply a group of windows that appear together in the same space; some may consist of two windows and some of five, in which case it would make sense that their representation in the sidebar reflected this nature. > I disagree, the list of window titles is more concise and if you can't > discern which window is which by the title text, then that application is > broken (needs to have a more descriptive window title text). I don't find > tiny thumbnails to be particularly helpful in most cases. > Anything less than 400px or so is too small to really be able to identify > what you're looking at (below that, all windows start to look like grey > boxes unless they have some really unique content. I guess gimp's photo > windows would be identifiable, but eg any website would > start to look like any other website in such a small thumbnail, all word > processing docs would definitely look alike). > Just for reference, I was thinking of showing the same thumbnails that now appear when you press down during the Alt+tab switcher.
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
