Hello there, I kind of agree here, those icons don't look very nice. Too light on the top and too dark on the bottom, they don't blend well with, for example the next/prev arrows. Those have a lower contrast and thinner borders plus they don't look as bumpy.
They could use some love indeed. Cheers, Alberto 2011/3/12 Bob Hazard <[email protected]>: > On 10 March 2011 03:20, Robert Park <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:12 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> But is there any plan to replace the ugly default gnome icons with a new >>> fresh set of icons >>> by final release of gnome 3? >> >> Just out of curiosity, but which icons are the 'ugly' default ones? I >> hope you're not calling Tango ugly... > > > The default zoom-in/zoom-out icons in gnome always look really bad to > me. I understand the difficulty in not wanting to look like the Find > icon or Add/Remove but they catch my eye as if they were from a > different set > > http://www.gnome.org/img/flash/gnome3-teaser.png > > > I'm a big fan of the Tango philosophy though, especially at 16x16 > where the well defined edges are great, such as in the nautilus places > bar. > > -- > Sent from my Amiga > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
