On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:59:03PM -0400, jordan wrote: > 2nd. So, the "seamless transition" from Gnome2 to Gnome3 actually > translates into "hey current gnome-users, as of > Gnome3 - us gnome-developers no longer give a crap if your software > can be integrated into our desktop, if your software does not work > properly comply with the MASS changes we have made to our desktop > (even though EVERY other Desktop is properly supported), too bad... > it's not our problem. (even though, we are the one's introducing every > single problem, essentially). That's not seamless, it's short-sided > at best. it also might be the death of gnome for many many people.
GNOME 2.32 already relied on Pulseaudio. For the rest, request to please change your tone. I understand you care about this, but your argumentation is pretty emotional. As such, I'm not going to respond. This as I don't think an emotional discussion will ever lead to a change of opinion or better insight. I kindly explained the reasoning behind it and getting such a reply is not appreciated. Feel free to discuss anything on gnome-shell-list, but please follow https://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct or just wait a bit before sending an email. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
