On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 14:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> Hi Sergey, >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Sergey Udaltsov <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Would it make sense to consolidate all HW+GL-related information >> > (requirements) on a single page on live.gnome.org? Minimal list of >> > extensions, hints ("do not use this driver, do not use those chips, >> > etc") >> I think we really do need a high level description of the current >> state somewhere, yes. >> My understanding is roughly at least for Intel "any card ≥ i915/945", >> though i915 is about the very minimum. We do need to get recent data >> about ATI and NVIDIA; can anyone help fill in? > > My "nVidia Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 230M] (rev a2)" seems to be > working very well; no issues and performance is very good. > > Display is totally frack'd on resume [from suspend or hibernate]. But I > believe that is just an issue with suspend/resume not working with GNOME > 3 in general(?). > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list >
It's not a general problem with Gnome 3. Hibernate and suspend both work correctly here (though I could do without briefly seeing a console screen during the process) and shell is snappy, with no visible rendering artefacts of any kind: - up-to-date F15 Beta - GPU: nVidia 9800GT - nouveau drivers A few days ago I tried a multihead setup. Gnome shell worked perfectly, though the resolutions for the second monitor and the inital GDM screen were not picked up correctly by X. -- Elia _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
