I do apologize to the dedicated developers who are trying to make things better. I certainly do not know who is actually working on the project.
Still a bit paranoid.. On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:07 -0700, Luis Villa wrote: > The project is led by people who have given more than a half-decade > (and in many cases more than a decade) of their lives to this project. > This allegation is insulting to them and embarrassing to you, since it > indicates you have no idea who is actually working on their project. > You should apologize. > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Bob Gustafson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps the Gnome developer group has been infiltrated by folks who are > > paid to make FOSS look bad? > > > > Just paranoid.. > > > > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote: > >> I've just installed Gnome Shell as part of a F15 build, it's the first > >> time I've played with it and have pretty much ignored the build up as > >> I prefer to judge these things myself. > >> > >> While I'm not totally comfortable yet with the changes I'm willing to > >> use it for a couple of weeks before making decisions as to whether > >> I'll stick with it or not. I've been using F14 with a Compiz desktop > >> for 2-3 years now. > >> > >> I've read assorted arguments in assorted threads regarding human > >> multitasking capabilities and frankly don't want to get into those > >> arguments. > >> > >> What I don't understand however is the removal of critical/semi > >> critical indicators from the system without any replacement extensions > >> being available and if I've read some mailing list threads correctly > >> no intention to provide replacements. > >> > >> Specifically the removal of the hardware monitoring and CPU, Network > >> etc.... monitoring applets I just do not understand the reasoning > >> behind. There is a quantum difference between multi tasking and > >> process/activity monitoring. I've many times been working on one of > >> my machines when a panel indicator has drawn my attention to something > >> that needed further investigation, sometimes without merit, on a > >> couple of occasions it's possibly saved machines. > >> > >> There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the logic? > >> > >> Also is there a way to change to format of the date/time on the top > >> bar? I prefer to use a 12 hour clock with an am/pm suffix and no > >> leading zeros. > >> > >> Thanks and I will state I've been impressed with the stability, more > >> eye candy would be nice though. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gnome-shell-list mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnome-shell-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list > > _______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
