Ya think this is my problem:

[mcarter@liandra /]$ ls /sys/bus/acpi/devices/
device:00  device:04  device:08   LNXCPU:02    PNP0000:00  PNP0501:00
 PNP0B00:00  PNP0C0F:00  PNP0C0F:04
device:01  device:05  IPI0001:00  LNXCPU:03    PNP0100:00  PNP0700:00
 PNP0C01:00  PNP0C0F:01  PNP0C0F:05
device:02  device:06  LNXCPU:00   LNXPWRBN:00  PNP0103:00  PNP0800:00
 PNP0C02:00  PNP0C0F:02  PNP0C0F:06
device:03  device:07  LNXCPU:01   LNXSYSTM:00  PNP0200:00  PNP0A03:00
 PNP0C04:00  PNP0C0F:03  PNP0C0F:07

Can't restart right now so I'll have to get the test logs later.  If there
still needed....



On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:11 AM, xtranophilist aaa
<[email protected]>wrote:

>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 17:31, Philipp Mohrenweiser 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> works well at my self compiled shell for ubuntu 11.4 :D
>> thanx a lot!
>>
>> cheers phil
>>
>
> Great!
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 19:09, G. Michael Carter <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I just tried and gnome-shell kept crashing.  Is there any required
>> plugins?
>>
>> Also is there any plans to have a wiki page or a common places for all
>> these extensions (something like google chrome or firefox extensions pages)?
>>
>> I can see this being a scattered mess with extensions popping up all over
>> the web.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>
> No, it doesn't require any plugin. Which system are you on? If you boot
> into runlevel 3, login and then do 'startx' to start gnome, error messages
> would be visible on Ctrl+Alt+F1. I would be very much thankful if you could
> post the error that caused the crash.
>
> Yes, it would be great if the official developers create a wiki for
> extensions and keep all those TESTED OK extensions. Maybe they will one day.
>
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Giovanni Campagna <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno mer, 01/06/2011 alle 17.19 +0545,
>>>
>>> It works on my system (another F15) as well, but I don't think it
>>> reliable to use sysfs paths. It could break with different kernel
>>> versions, bios versions, acpi configurations, etc.
>>> What you need is a portable library (upower? libgtop? something entirely
>>> new?) providing that information, possibly developed along with the
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>> Giovanni
>>>
>>>
> Yeah, that would be more reliable. The extension finds the temperature from
> the file /sys/bus/acpi/devices/LNXTHERM\:00/thermal_zone/temp. Don't know if
> there is more generic way to do it. Maybe a similar file on sys fs exists in
> all kind of system that stores the temperature, so the extension could be
> made to check all those possible files and use the correct one for the
> system. I certainly should do more research to find the most efficient way
> that would be utilizing something that comes with the kernel. Thanks for the
> vision.
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to