On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org>wrote:
> Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me> writes: > > >> - if the system is under heavy load, I really don't enjoy switching to > >> the overview > >> > > You want notification if the system is behaving out of spec really. > > A system under heavy load is out of spec? > Out of spec of what is normal for you. So if you're doing heavy cpu things then maybe 90% cpu utilization is okay, but 100% utilization of two of your cpus might raise your eyebrows. What would be out of spec for you in your workflow? > > I frequently have quite expensive tasks: compiling, graph querying, > graph transformations, etc. Sure, that's not the usual web-browsing and > letter-writing kind of stuff, but that shouldn't exclude me from using > GNOME3. (Well, not that it would do. :-)) > > Why did you assume that this is something exclusionary? I'm trying to say that system behaviour tuned relative to your workflow integrates better with GNOME 3 design and really what we should be shooting for. > And nothing would be more inconvenient than having notifications for > cpu-intensive tasks. Here, the relation between intendedly > cpu-intensive task and freaked out process is something like 1000 to 1. > > See my point above about being relatively out of spec for your workflow. sri
_______________________________________________ gnome-shell-list mailing list gnome-shell-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
