On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Jasper St. Pierre <[email protected]>
 wrote:

>
> I see this a lot. I want to do things *without* going to Activities.
> So I raise the question, why is the Activities mode seen as a last
> resort, why is it a nuisance to go to the overview?
>

Simply: on certain devices and workflows, it breaks concentration more than
it assists it.

This happened to me today: I'm writing code in Eclipse, and needed the
calculator.  If I weren't already using Docky, I would have to *stop*
looking at my code, have it zoom out just to get a calculator on the screen,
and then have it all zoom back in after I've launched it.  Then I'd have to
find the place I was at in the code, that I just lost because I had to go to
the overview, to find the numbers to plug in.

This breaks my train of thought right into pieces; it was (and remains)
infinitely less distracting for me to just throw the mouse over to the
left-hand side of the screen and push the "Calculator" icon.

I think, basically, that the overview *is* useful, but only in some
situations and on certain devices, like tablets, phones, and other assorted
touchscreen-driven devices.  I welcome it, in those cases - like on my
Android device (I can see the direct heritige between Android's app menu and
Gnome-Shell's Activities Overview).  But on a computer, and with a guy who
generally tends to summon and dismiss certain applications with frequency,
going to overview paradoxically is more of a distraction than otherwise (I
say "paradoxically" given that the point of the Overview is to keep one more
on task).

Also, there seem to be a number of keyboard combinations and shortcuts
already that exist to shortcut around the Activities area, like a keycombo
to switch workspaces.  If G-S has those, I'm led to believe that even the
developers believe there is some value in doing some things without having
to go to the Overview... I'm merely requesting that some of those shortcuts
translate better to mouse operation.


I'm going to postulate that you're on a laptop with a touchpad, and
> that dragging your finger to get to the other side of the screen is
> somewhat annoying.


I was at my desktop... but even on a laptop, I disable the touchpad.  My fat
hands tend to hit it while I'm typing, sometimes sending the pointer into
outer space, sometimes clicking something unintentionally.  We're talking
plain-old mouse here.



> I'm going to
> suggest that, if possible, we have a global touchpad hotspot: the
> top-left corner (top-right in RTL) enters the overview without
> changing the mouse position.
>

Interestingly enough, part of the problem is that the screen hotspot (not
the touchpad one) does not work with a Synergy-driven multi-screen setup
(where one of the monitors is on the left).  The animation to summon
activities fires, but the activities screen simply never appears.  This is
*not a Gnome-Shell problem*, and I'm aware of that, but it *is* part of the
reason.

Mostly, I just find I accomplish a few things quicker by sidestepping
Activities; its why I use Docky, and why I'd like the Dash to optionally be
available on the desktop (so I can use it instead of a 3rd party program).



> For those with real mice, I've found it quite easy to get into the
> overview (just a quick flick of the wrist), but others have had
> trouble.
>

Getting into it is easy enough - I have no complaints about that.  I
sometimes just don't want to go to another part of the OS at all.



> Global menus have been discussed time and time again. There is a plan
> to fix this -- Application global menu. *snip* This wasn't implemented in
>
> time for 3.0, but I believe Colin Walters is working on it right.
>

Sweet!



> "sinking" or "parking" have been proposed before. I'm not sure where
> the designers fall on this, but just ask them!
>

Also sweet.

Just to be clear, I am totally on board with no more minimization.  I don't
like that I've enabled the workaround (putting minimize back via
gnome-tweak) just to have this functionality; I would *rather* the app go to
workspace below and not vanish into the pit of "where is it?"; I just wish
it were as easy to do this.  The keyboard shortcut is halfway there, but
makes you move to workspace below *with* the app, which I don't want.



> The categories in Applications are planning on being removed, for
> reasons I do agree with. The current menu categories are muddled and
> used inconsistently. Some apps put themselves in four or five
> categories to be easily findable when they do meet all of those
> categories. If we're trying to work around this by playing games with
> the category system, well, let's just remove it.
>

Well, OK, that makes sense, but... how do they intend to replace the
functionality?

Are they seriously considering just having a gigantic screen-sized grid of
totally un-categorized applications to select from as the only option?
 That's less optimal than having categories with duplicates in it, by a lot.
 The visible search area is simply too large, and the number of applications
I have installed too numerous, to easily and quickly find with the category
set to "all".

Upon further thought, I think my problem (above and here) is that I find the
"Applications" part of activities to be nigh-on unusable *without* the
keyboard, which was not the case with the old Gnome 2 menu system.  Maybe
there's something wrong with me, I don't know, but I think it has something
to do with the area I'm searching through; the menus were confined, mostly,
to the upper-left corner of the screen, and were a single-list... which, for
reasons I can't explain, I can scan through and decide upon far easier than
the full-screen grid of huge icon tiles I am presented with in G-S.  I tried
to use it three or four times, but it took so long to find anything, every
time, that I just resigned myself to using the search and just pinning the
app to the Dock (so I would never have to do this again for this app).

 --G
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list

Reply via email to