On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
>
> -unescape_character (const char *scanner)
> +unescape_character (const gchar *scanner)
Why this change? We don't normally use gchar and gint types.
And then you do:
+ for (scanner = (guchar *)uri; *scanner != '\0'; scanner++, length--) {
as if scanner was guchar.
- guchar *base;
- guchar *read_ptr;
- guchar *write_ptr;
+ gchar *base;
+ gchar *read_ptr;
+ gchar *write_ptr;
gint alloc;
same here, use char.
Otherwise it seems to look ok.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's a short-sighted coffee-fuelled gangster gone bad. She's a strong-willed
psychic safe cracker from a family of eight older brothers. They fight crime!
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
