tir, 12,.04.2005 kl. 11.39 +0200, skrev Alexander Larsson:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 15:08 +0200, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
> >
> > -unescape_character (const char *scanner)
> > +unescape_character (const gchar *scanner)
>
> Why this change? We don't normally use gchar and gint types.
> And then you do:
> + for (scanner = (guchar *)uri; *scanner != '\0'; scanner++, length--) {
> as if scanner was guchar.
>
Just residue after trying out const guchar * as the arg, I'll clean it
up.
>
> - guchar *base;
> - guchar *read_ptr;
> - guchar *write_ptr;
> + gchar *base;
> + gchar *read_ptr;
> + gchar *write_ptr;
> gint alloc;
>
> same here, use char.
>
Sure thing.
> Otherwise it seems to look ok.
>
Thanks. Want me to post the final thing here too?
Cheers
Kjartan
_______________________________________________
gnome-vfs-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
