On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:49 -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:57 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Here is another (untested) patch which attempts to > > address the second part of the problem, but only doing > > the 8-times a second timeout for delayed event processing > > if there are any events to process. > > See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348748 for a patch that > short-circuits the need for an event processing timer by not matching > moved_from and moved_to events (doesn't hurt because we don't deliver > them anyways.)
Can we get this commited? It sounds like a major win. (I can't really review this code, because I don't really know it.) _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
