Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:49 -0400, John McCutchan wrote: > >> On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:57 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >>> Here is another (untested) patch which attempts to >>> address the second part of the problem, but only doing >>> the 8-times a second timeout for delayed event processing >>> if there are any events to process. >>> >> See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348748 for a patch that >> short-circuits the need for an event processing timer by not matching >> moved_from and moved_to events (doesn't hurt because we don't deliver >> them anyways.) >> > > Can we get this commited? It sounds like a major win. (I can't really > review this code, because I don't really know it.) > > > I will be testing it tonight and will commit it soon.
-- John McCutchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list
