On 6/13/05, Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the last time I tried it, "baz status" had other random crap tacked > > on as well (and mucked up the standard part a bit too for no > > apparent reason). > > Could you detail a bit more on that point?
I haven't checked since baz 1.3. I sent zillions of nitpicky bug reports about that version -- including this issue -- but didn't get much response (my optimistic side hopes that somebody actually fixed those problems and just didn't say anything, but I expect it's more likely they were just ignored). Basically I think it was that the "M filname" style output was gratuitously indented or something (which mucks up any script that uses a regexp like '^[ADM] ...'). > I think "changes" should have been an alias for "diff", actually. No. It should just do what tla changes does. Not only is that compatible, but it's useful functionality as well. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
