Miles Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I haven't checked since baz 1.3. I sent zillions of nitpicky bug > reports about that version
I suppose you're talking of things like http://lists.seyza.com/pipermail/gnu-arch-dev/2005-February/000669.html > I expect it's more likely they were just ignored). I went quickly through it. Many of the issues you've reported have been fixed since then (resolved, message without "*" prefix, update being too verbose for example) ... > Basically I think it was that the "M filname" style output was > gratuitously indented or something (which mucks up any script that > uses a regexp like '^[ADM] ...'). ... but not this one. Actually, status puts different things in the first and second columns. I'm not 100% clear about the rationale for the distinction. If you get time, you may give baz another try. Your feedback and perhaps your help can be very valuable. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
