Hi, there are several archive formats out there that are or being planned to be covered by the present and future versions of Arch. While there are some annoyances of the current Arch 1/baz format (not "user friendly", problem on MS Windows systems), Arch 2.0 and bzr have their own still evolving formats.
I wonder what are the advantages and the disadvantages of the new Arch 2.0 format vs. the bzr format? And, is there any possibility that a new Arch can adapt the git format as is, so Arch can directly operate on git repositories? _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
