I blurbled: > Disadvantages: > > * bzr (aka bazaar 2.x) currently suffers from the same history buildup > problems that bazaar and arch do.
This is true today, but won't be. In the future, weave will be there, which should on average have pretty good space savings.* * I suspect that the performance savings will also be sufficiently good to not need anything like revision libraries and arch caches. > > > And, is there any possibility that a new Arch can > > adapt the git format as is, so Arch can directly > > operate on git repositories? > > -- > James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed > Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnu-arch-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users > > GNU arch home page: > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/ -- James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
