also sprach Aldrik KLEBER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.08.22.1455 +0200]: > the problem of baz actually is the documentation, baz need extra effort on > this matter. I migrate from tla to baz, and it's true that even with tla > background I was a bit disapointed with the documentation. But bazaar itself > is good
Sure it is, for the technologically interested or versed. But not for the user who is expected to e.g. maintain webpages therein. > > Also, I often end up making a mess of my repository and would like > > to be able to commit revisions by cherry-picking changes/hunks. > > darcs does this very nicely. > > > tla and baz too, this is a natural way of working. No, you misunderstand me. Imagine I check out patch-10 and make two changes to the same file, which are completely unrelated. I would like one change to become patch-11, the other patch-12. The only way to do this in baz to my knowledge is reverting one of the changes, commit, reapply, commit. darcs asks you which hunks out of a file you want to commit. > > So if I made two changes to a file, I can commit once and select > > only the first hunk, then commit again and let it write the second > > hunk to the archive. > you can commit > _ the full tree : baz commit > _ a set of file: baz commit file1 file2 file3 > or baz commit --file-list list_of_file_to_commit.txt > _ just a file : baz commit file1 I want hunk level, not file level. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] invalid/expired pgp (sub)keys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED] chaos reigns within. reflect, repent, reboot. order shall return.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
