On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:34:11PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:45:46PM +0200, Matthieu MOY wrote: > >> martin f krafft said: > >> > >> > Another thing I am completely missing from baz is better/more > >> > flexibly/scalable hook support. > >> > >> That's very hard to do in a secure way: baz hooks are arbitrary code, and > >> have to be ran on the client since there's no real server. And I don't > >> want arbitrary code to be executed on my machine when I run baz ... > > > > Not to pick nits, but hooks aren't arbitrary code. They're code that > > traditionally the user himself has written. > > Hooks in the way Bazaar manages them (~/.arch-params/hook), yes. But > Martin was asking for a hook managed in the archive itself. In this > case, you can't trust the code by default (the wiki desribes a way to > store the hook in the working tree, actually).
/me feels his jaw drop in shock Martin, tell me it's not so? -- James Blackwell | Life is made of the stuff that hasn't killed Tell someone a joke! | you yet. - yours truly ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400 _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
