Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, an interesting question is, why git at this > stage? While git is being used, it is younger than > any of these. How come there seem to be an impression > that git is usable today, more so than arch, baz, bzr, > etc.?
Perhaps because it's used to manage the Linux kernel? :-P Peter _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
