Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd compare this to CVS/Subversion situation.
Except that from an end-user viewpoint, I'm not sure it looks archaic compared to Cogito and the likes. > I'd say that GNU Arch has changed its name and its maintainer, not > that it is being buried. However, tla was the GNU implementation of Arch. Since it is no longer maintained and Bazaar 1.x is regarded as its continuation, then maybe Bazaar 1.x should officially become part of the GNU Project and be referred to as the only maintained Arch (1.x) implementation? Admittedly, that wouldn't make any difference technically. But it would bind an actively developed and used implementation to the name "GNU Arch". Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
