Ludovic Court?s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm wondering about the future of GNU Arch users. I've been using tla > for a year or so and I've always considered it a good tool, even today. > However, it seems that many (most?) people on this list don't consider > tla/baz as valuable tools anymore and are considering moving to GIT or > Bazaar 2 ASAP (which is, IMO, quite a radical change).
I really like the Arch dumb server model and append-only, orthogonal storage/changeset format, and that's why I'm sticking with baz/tla 1.x for the forseeable future. > Anyway, does anyone have interest in maintaining tla? A pre-1.4 release > was announced in February but 1.4 never went out; additionally, 1.3.3 is > broken on some architectures (at least SPARC and PPC). I'm still using tla 1.2 on some machines, and generally works well enough that I don't bother to compile a new upgrade. My primary machines are baz, though. -- Eric Wong
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
