[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Neither will I, and I'll probobly wait until GNU Arch 2.x is released. > > Likewise. I see no compelling reason to give up using GNU Arch 1 so far > (but since I'm not a ``power user'' I might have missed important > flaws).
There are mainly two points: 1) Teach a beginner how to use baz or tla. See how long it takes. 2) Run "baz status" in a large tree. See how long it takes. In both cases, most other modern RCS beat GNU Arch by an order of magnitude. This doesn't remove the numerous qualities of Arch, but it's just that we know it's possible to do better. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
