Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Besides, a revlib consumes a _huge_ amount of inodes that constitutes a > real problem in many cases (compared to one tarball per 50 revisions).
My sysadmin was a bit angry while reinstalling my machine (with a newer distro), since I didn't delete my revlib before that, and the backup+restore of the 2 or 3 Gb of revlib I had took several hours. He would have been even more angry if I told him how long it took to rm -fr */ the revision library (because backup+restore had invalidated my inode signature)... ;-) -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/