Matthew Hannigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 06:57:06PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: >> > Besides, a revlib consumes a _huge_ amount of inodes that constitutes a >> > real problem in many cases (compared to one tarball per 50 revisions). >> >> git already proved this is not a real problem. > > It's has been something that has troubled the kernel.org people.
I think that's the reason why the packed format of git has been implemented (but I didn't follow the history closely enough). -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
