Andy Tai wrote:
tla tree-id
(for tla 1.3.4 or later)
Hasn't it already been decided multiple times that tree-id is a truly
awful name for that command?
tla patch-level
comes off the top of my head but there's probably a better one than
that. The "id" situation is already confusing enough without
overloading "id" again.
Bob
_______________________________________________
Gnu-arch-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
GNU arch home page:
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
