On 3/23/06, Robert Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hasn't it already been decided multiple times that tree-id is a truly > awful name for that command? > > tla patch-level > > comes off the top of my head but there's probably a better one than > that. The "id" situation is already confusing enough without > overloading "id" again. > OK, I am not sure where did the discussion about the name tree-id occur (maybe on the bazaar list? I was not involved then). In any case, there is another alias for the same command, tree-revision, which fits the terminology in Arch and should be clearer.
> Bob > > _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
