Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > Wrong. At present, Arch can incorporate Linux code, and vice versa, > > No, not at all, the license conditions for arch are _or_later_, these > are terms different than those for Linux, so you _CANNOT_ incoperate > changes from Arch into Linux. The GPL states that the license terms > must be the same, since they are not, the two licenses are not > compatible.
You're confusing the permissions notice, which allows a disjunction of template licenses, with the template licenses themselves, each of which individually must remain unchanged. The "or later" phrasing is simply a compact way to express what legally is a multiple license, akin to the GPL+FDL licensing recommended by the FSF for code examples in documentation. _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
