> You're confusing the permissions notice, which allows a > disjunction of template licenses, with the template licenses > themselves, each of which individually must remain unchanged. > The "or later" phrasing is simply a compact way to express > what legally is a multiple license, akin to the GPL+FDL > licensing recommended by the FSF for code examples in > documentation. > > You clearly do not undertstand the GPL, > > b. You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that > in whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program > or any part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge > to all third parties under the terms of this License. > > > `or later' is part of the license terms, much like a the clauses of > Bison that allow people to use the output in non-free software. >
I'm pretty sure you're wrong, Alfred but before I explain why: can you cite a source for that opinion? Is there something in the FSF's GPL FAQ, for example? Can you quote anything that states otherwise? Instead of asking silly questions, you can simply send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Gnu-arch-users mailing list Gnu-arch-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users GNU arch home page: http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
