> > I prefer the first, I don't see the point of distributing a useless > > program that still depends on a non-free part that now cannot be > > loaded. Linux-libre chooses this solution, stating that the modified > > Unless it doesnt depend on non-free parts, because there is free > firmware.
Sure. The example is the broadcom b43 driver, which has a non-free firmware and a free one. We should distribute both the module and the free firmware together.
