El 18 de agosto de 2009 09:28, Rubén Rodríguez Pérez<ru...@gnu.org> escribió: > >> > I prefer the first, I don't see the point of distributing a useless >> > program that still depends on a non-free part that now cannot be >> > loaded. Linux-libre chooses this solution, stating that the modified >> >> Unless it doesnt depend on non-free parts, because there is free >> firmware. > > Sure. The example is the broadcom b43 driver, which has a non-free > firmware and a free one. We should distribute both the module and the > free firmware together. >
and if there is not a free driver now, we must help its development, so me must distribute the free driver alone -- Diego Saravia diego.sara...@gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->d...@unsa.edu.ar
