jaromil wrote: > > re all, > > more on Chromium / Iron: > > I've been using Iron now for a while and it very much resembles > Chromium; after being generally happy with the speed of the software, > I was looking for more precise informations about the patches applied > by Iron - then today a friend (Google employee) passed me this link: > > http://neugierig.org/software/chromium/notes/2009/12/iron.html > > I still didn't do a code review on Iron myself, nor even diff'd its > source against Chromium's trunk, however the above link reads like a > veritable analysis to me that, along with the poor documentation on > Iron that its developers provide, basically erodes my trust for futher > usage.
Yeah that, plus the iron site has more ads than http://x10.com > I'm now opting for Chromium, nevertheless it would be really nice if > the GNU project can host a patch-set that is peer-reviewed for > characteristics that we regard as freedom and privacy respecting. > > All doe there might be no need for that at all: from what I can hear > in informal conversations among Google developers, it seems that the > Chromium codebase might conform with our requirements. -- Daniel JB Clark | Sys Admin, Free Software Foundation pobox.com/~dclark | http://www.fsf.org/about/staff#danny
