On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:15:07 +0100 jaromil <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 01:03:49AM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote: > > > The greatest irony for me is Google (apparently) provides > 3/4 of > > Mozilla corps funding. Wonder what'll happen to them now.
.. > Plus I've had very bad experience interacting with Mozilla, I suspect there is almost enough people in that situation to start a club ;) (As for their build system... bleh). > > Just so I'm sure what you're saying: You say that being able to turn > > *off* "incognito" is ok, as long as "incognito" is the default > > behaviour? > > oh no. i'm saying is ok to have incognito as default and then > optionally switch to "public" mode; i suspect if that would have been > the policy of Firefox earlier we would have much less problems in the > wild with all kinds of predators for people's privacy. ok :) > > I would consider forking without attempting to work with upstream > > first bad, no question. (I don't consider slapping some new branding > > on top to be a fork). > > yep, sure not. > > somehow Iron plays also on ambiguity between forking and branding. Yeah. > [1] seen this? http://freebeer.fscons.org eheheh hehe, I hadn't. kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
