I have a devised a much better plan. It requires changes in git that I
believe will be useful to solve the very kind of rebase (and rewrite
history) problems that often give git users grief, so I expect it to be
welcome (unless my plan is flawed), and it shouldn't be hard to
implement.
Could you tell us more about it? Those sound like a lot of practical
advantages, but we should check that it really solves the problem.
--
Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org
