On 06/14/2016 08:29 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > El Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:11:35 -0400 > Ineiev <[email protected]> escribió: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:45:14PM +0000, hellekin wrote: >>> >>> Last news I had was that after this, another team decided to take >>> over. Maybe it didn't happen. The #ututo channel on Freenode >>> wasn't used in the last 3 months. >>> >>> Maybe leave it in the list, but mark it deprecated? >> >> If it is not maintained, it shouldn't be in the list; we can add it >> again when it's active. > > The website is still alive. Perhaps it would be better if the distro > is on a secondary level, let's say in a separate table or in a separate > entry from GNU site, the intention would be to add a brief note about > the maintainer ship. Thus, the site of GNU does not lose the historical > record of free/libre distributions, perhaps attracting people interested > in the future can take care of the distro.
+1 I think stable free distros should be added in a separated table and we add a campaign to encourage users to help maintain and improve those unmaintained free distros. Even, we should check another free distros such as BLAG, Dyne:bolic and Musix since seems there aren't activities in their web sites, mailing lists, etc. BTW, i suggest PureOS join forces with a free distro instead of create a distro from scratch (eg. Musix is a Debian-based distro like them, then it could be a good example to be considered) :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
