On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:06:16AM -0300, coadde wrote: > On 06/14/2016 08:29 PM, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: > > > > The website is still alive.
But it says the distro is dead, doesn't it (I'm no Spanish speaker, sorry)? > > Perhaps it would be better if the distro > > is on a secondary level, let's say in a separate table or in a separate > > entry from GNU site, the intention would be to add a brief note about > > the maintainer ship. Thus, the site of GNU does not lose the historical > > record of free/libre distributions, perhaps attracting people interested > > in the future can take care of the distro. > > +1 I think stable free distros should be added in a separated table and > we add a campaign to encourage users to help maintain and improve those > unmaintained free distros. On the other hand, they'd better (and it's much easier to) join an active free distro. > Even, we should check another free distros such as BLAG, Dyne:bolic and > Musix since seems there aren't activities in their web sites, mailing > lists, etc. As far as I understand, these distros don't claim they are unmaintained; moreover, it seems to me there is some ongoing work.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
