quil...@riseup.net wrote: > On Fri, October 11, 2019 2:37 pm, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >> Quiliro Ordóñez <quil...@riseup.net> wrote: >>> This is a report I have received from some GNU libre distro hackers: >> >> What kind of delegation is it? Why don’t they post here directly? > > The bug report had been filed on Guix 8 months ago and the other data has > been addressed on this mailing list.
I’m afraid I missed the point of your answer, but don’t bother. Let assume that it was you who wrote it. >>> This the bug report in Guix: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34565 >> >>> I would like the FSF to take a stance on this immediately. I think a week >>> is more than enough, considering that this issue has been analyzed before. >>> I feel that a distro that has a freedom critical bug should not take such a >>> long time delay to correct it. >> >> I skimmed through the bug report thread and the only question I have: why it >> had not been closed 8 month ago. All possible issues risen there seems to >> be debunked. Or did I missed something? > > Yes, the other links i gave. The other link (the only one) is [0]. It was never mentioned in the bugreport, as far as I see. And I do not understand why it should be — the relevant part of page it leads adds nothing to the issue. [0] https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:chromiums_freedom_flaws
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
