Quiliro Ordóñez <quil...@riseup.net> writes: [...]
> This the bug report in Guix: > http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34565 that bug report is about "ungoogled-chromium may contain Widevine DRM" it is implicit, but I *must* stress it, that this means "ungoogled-chromium Guix package" (the package definition is in Guile and is almost human readeable) this bug report was deeply analyzed by several Guix team members, I contributed a little bit (I am not a mainteiner of Guix), and now it's closed since ungoogled-chromium distributed as part of Guix does *not* contain Widevine DRM there are other bug reports about ungoogled-chromium in Guix: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both;include=subject%3Achromium;package=Guix and all DFSG related ones was addressed in a timely manner > This is the analysis of Chromium Ungoogled and Chromium by Hyperbola: > https://wiki.hyperbola.info/doku.php?id=en:main:chromiums_freedom_flaws Interesting analysis, I'm almost sure all the issues pointed in that analisys are _well_ addressed in ungoogled-chromium from Guix, if you or any other person find some *specific* issue in that package please file a proper bug report via bug-g...@gnu.org AFAIK all Guix mainainers are working hard to keep Guix FSDG compliant, if you want to help please point to *specific* issues > I would like the FSF to take a stance on this immediately. I think a > week is more than enough, considering that this issue has been analyzed > before. I feel that a distro that has a freedom critical bug should not > take such a long time delay to correct it. You are wrong, http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34565 is not a freedom critical bug Neither this https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34605 [...] HTH! Gio' -- Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
