Quiliro Ordóñez <[email protected]> wrote: > El 2019-10-13 07:32, Dmitry Alexandrov escribió: >> bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1) is the debian kernel FSDG-free? >>> FSDG-free >> >> I’m very disappointed to see this ugly collocation becoming so widespread >> here, so it started, as @[email protected] demonstrated us, contaminate the >> word ‘free’ as in ‘free software’ by itself. This is definitely not, what >> RMS with his careful use of language would approve. >> >> I understand, that it’s probably calqued from ‘DFSG-free’, but that phrase >> is okay — DFSG is a criteria for free software in general, while FSDG is >> not. So it may be, say, ‘FSDG-compliant’ or ‘FSDG-ready’, not ‘FSDG-free’. > > This provides no useful information. > It is centered on me
How is it centered on you? You are by no mean the only one, who is used to use this misleading phrase. > The policy is what is in discussion and has not called for the questioned > parties to argue against the case makers. The FSF is the one which should > make the calls for freedom Sorry, I failed to grasp the point. Could you reiterate in other words?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
