> this is diversion of that fundamental and critical topic This topic was just forked, look at the the subject line. Why not discuss the terminology also? (You are not forced to do this.)
> "FSDG-free", along with "FSDG-compliant" and > "FSDG-compatible", have been used quite commonly and > interchangeably on this list I am not a native English speaker but "FSDG-free" sounds rather as "free of FSDG obligations" to me.
