On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 19:30:13 +0200 Denis wrote: > Is it because they lack source code or because their license is nonfree? > I need that information for convincing Guix to remove them.
as i remember, despite the lengthy discussion (mostly about the engine), the only conclusive evidence presented was in the OP from april - this issue does seem overdue for a conclusion On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 01:24:57 +0200 Denis wrote: > Its license contains the following[1]: > > 3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes > > reselling the game as an individual item. i assume that source code is available, because those games are in debian 'main' - but if that quote is part of the license, the license is clearly non-free; so the source code can be ignored is this our conclusion? - or does this reduce to case of the fonts license mentioned by ruben yesterday?
